For some honest gaming journalists, this year’s E3 was pretty disappointing. The games industry has never been in such flux, yet the showings at one of the biggest industry shows of the year were very samey – lots of ultraviolence, lots of cutscenes and not a lot in terms of innovation. It seems that in general the games world is in the doldrums. (Click here to read the rest of this entry)
The fact that Diablo 3 was being released this year was mostly a curiosity to me. I had played a bit of Diablo 1 and 2, played a reasonable bit of Torchlight, and had attempted (and failed) to get into World of Warcraft. The action RPG never really caught me, because of a variety of gameplay and gaming reasons. But as Diablo 3 release day grew closer, my friends got more and more excited about it. I was interested to see how the real-currency auction house would work, and I had faith that Blizzard had enough people, experience and smarts to make a great game. And a good few days later, here I am, reviewing it. The one-line review is that I like it, but I am very, very uncomfortable about that.
To put it favourably, Action RPGs are all about taking the mechanics and settings of standard RPGs and streamlining them to be more arcade-like. You still have stats and gear, but you don’t have skills like Diplomacy, or Crafting. Everything is about killing bad dudes. Gear makes your stats higher, which makes you better at killing bad dudes and better at not being killed by bad dudes. You have skills but they are really different attacks or abilities. My Diablo 3 character is a female Witch Doctor. Her skills are shooting blow darts, or throwing jars of spiders at people, or throwing frogs at people, or throwing decaying zombies at people… you get the idea. You can choose a single skill from a bank of what you’ve unlocked by gaining levels. You can swap skills at almost any time. This gives you a bit of latitude in how you want to play. I play my Witch Doctor by creating a
clusterf mess of zombie dogs, gargantuan zombies, followers and spells I’ve thrown into the fray. Basically I stop throwing spells when the area that the bad guys were in stops moving.
Action RPGs are designed to be little pockets of bad guys that you encounter in an area. Kill them all and then you can move onto the next pocket. There are very few scene transitions, narrative or much that isn’t fight, fight, fight. Hence the name “action” RPGs.
Diablo 3 does this well. They shake up the “pockets of bad guys” just enough to keep you on your toes. A dead tree may actually animate and ambush you. Lizards or giant worms may advance on you by swimming through the sand like sharks. Birds may drop in from the sky. There’s a lot of flavour in it all. Bad guys have a bunch of tricks up their sleeves, although some of them are not so fun. Fear effects on bad guys is awesome – they all run away. Fear effects on you is not so great – you run away and lose control of your character. Same goes for “jailer” bad guys who can temporarily freeze you in your spot, or “waller” bad guys who can arbitrarily create smashable walls.
The environments have a lot of flavour. Each area has a different visual texture to the others. It may be the difference of lighting (an underground cavern may have very diffuse or very harsh lighting), or architecture (the ruined castles you wander through all look different) or just special effects like sand storms or swamp gas. Even the abilities have some great effects on them.
Levels are procedurally generated, so while the artists have put a bunch of work into the “local” art, the level design in general is some form of controlled randomness. This idea was borrowed from roguelikes like Angband. They’d randomly create the levels every time you entered a new one. Torchlight did the same thing, although not so successfully. They had an evil dungeon near town that had endless levels on top of each other, which was jarring if you had a level with lava everywhere somehow on top of a level of bottomless pits. Diablo 3 is a little more careful. Some levels are large plains that have cellars or a few levels of a hidden city underneath them. It’s logically consistent if a little fantastic, which is great.
Diablo 3 does this all very well. It’s a polished game and you can see a triple A developer has been working on it. What I don’t like is that a triple A developer could have done so much more.
After 12 years of development, really they’ve just come up with the same game. There’s some new classes and tweaks, there’s a bit more physics and particle effects to make things look interesting, but the gameplay is fundamentally the same. Which is to say incredibly shallow. Spam an area with attacks and that’s strategy. The difference between the classes seems to be the distance to your foes that you need to be (monk/barbarian – up close, wizard/witch doctor/demon hunter – at range) and how big an area your effects hit. Witch Doctors, for example, hit far and wide, but precision stuff is not so good. You can change this up with different skill load-outs, but there definitely seems to be an optimal load-out and all the rest are kinda flavour.
Even then, the experience is pretty empty. The writing and narrative are really quite terrible, although the ideas present suggest that there is a good writer in there trying to get out. All the quests are about killing everything in an area, maybe clicking on a book or two. No puzzles. No real choices. Everything is about making the numbers bigger. Like I’ve mentioned to my friends, this will become a game to play whilst listening to podcasts. Which doesn’t say much for the mental stimulus of Diablo 3.
Loot drops like rain, but it’s mostly trash. You can buy a weapon for say 2000 gold pieces, but if you found the same thing, you might get a handful of gold pieces in return. Even then, the merchants sell nothing of interest. Your blacksmith requires loot to improve, and you will sink hundreds of thousands of gold coins into him to just get him to be able to make something you want. And halfway through that process, a lapidary shows up and you need to do the same thing for him.
The heart of the game is loot. It’s the only way you improve outside of levelling, and levelling slows down over time. Because of the randomness of it all, you’re encouraged to shake down every last bookcase, punch every last coffin and run over every last gold coin on the ground. And this is where I really dislike the game. It becomes pure addiction. Very shallow gameplay, yet they constantly encourage you to act compulsively. You probably can play through Diablo 3 not grabbing all the loot not immediately in your path, but you will have a tougher time because of it.
Worse still is the game engine they decided on. It’s a MMO-like. You play on a server somewhere, even if you’re playing single player. The idea proposed by the developers is that this approach gets rid of the black market or grey market item selling, thus protecting their customers. But it also means you can’t play without an Internet connection. You get lag if the network or server is flaky.
Which would be okay if they went all the way with this, but they seemed to have ended on some half-arsed solution. A new player is not explained that they may lose their game or items if the server is shut down. In fact, you are fairly unceremoniously bounced from a game if this happens. You can’t use the auction house mid-game. You can’t even get the benefits of the auction house mid-game. The UI for contacting friends and being social is slightly awkward, a thing you’d think they’d have spot-on from 8 years of experience with WoW. And you’d especially think they’d know how to provision a few extra servers for the release date. With all the people, money and experience, they kinda did an underwhelming job. I feel uncomfortable supporting dev work like that.
The economics of it all, while still nascent and developing, are kinda worrying. Loot is plentiful but mostly worthless. You have to invest a not-insignificant portion of time picking up and selling loot (gold is automatically picked up if you’re nearby, why not items?) The gold auction house is in a weird state of flux. There’s a vast number of items that the game can procedurally generate, so there’s no baseline prices for anything and the market will have a hard time agreeing on a value on anything based on stats. Plus the gold auction house feels like a trainer for the real currency one. For example, the auctions for game gold charge a processing tax. I can understand that they want a coherent system, but that in itself is devious. If I can’t really tell the difference between virtual game gold and real money, what are Blizzard trying to encourage? Especially when they are taking a bit off the top for every auction, even ones that fail!
There’s something unsettling in the final product that I have a problem putting my finger on. I would have thought that you could have a hybrid server/single player model and still preserve the integrity of your auction house. If the server goes down, your computer takes over until it can pass the reins back to Blizzard. All the items you have generated by your computer aren’t signed by Blizzard, so they can’t be used in the auction house and maybe they get even poorer merchant exchange rates to avoid converting illegitimate goods into gold. Maybe only have rare identifiable items be auctionable, and identification is the process that generates an authorized item. These solutions aren’t foolproof, but with the amount of money and people they are throwing at this game, you think they’d try something better than booting single player gamers out of their game.
In addition, Diablo 3 really feels like an MMO-lite. There’s the endless cooldowns on abilities. Some I understand – you have to wait between changing a skill and using it, so you don’t get to use all skills all the time. Others are daft – the game encourages me to stand and watch a clock tick down before I can re-summon my zombie dogs. If the game knows there are no bad guys nearby and I’m not in combat, speed the cooldowns up! This is a single player game, and you don’t want the experience to be “I’m watching cooldowns tick down.”
All in all, it’s an okay game, but it’s unsettling. Blizzard has so much resources and sway, and really they’ve put out a graphically nicer version of a 12-year old game. It’s about as good as a game like this can be. But they haven’t innovated. They haven’t improved the customer experience (except for protecting against being ripped off by the item black market, which is a small problem at best). They’ve secured a profitable model for themselves, based on a shallow addictive experience, and given very little back to the customer. Definitely nothing with lasting value. A bunch of decisions could be made by fear or greed, but I’m willing to give Blizzard the benefit of the doubt. What I’m not willing to give them is any more of my money. They’re a triple A developer, an industry leader. They need to act like one.
After the explosion of triple A games late last year, I’ve finally cleaned through them and started playing a wider variety of games. A bunch of friends have recommended some awesome games, that I thought I might share with you.
- Legend of Grimrock: Old-school dungeon crawler with some modern graphics. You run a band of 4 adventurers thrown into a dungeon carved into Mount Grimrock. You have to descend to try to get out and solve the mystery of the Legend of Grimrock. Some of the interface takes getting used to, but it’s a neat game with lots of fighting, puzzles and secrets.
- Gemini Rue: An adventure game that is a gentle blend of sci-fi and classic noir. Kinda like a less fluorescent Blade Runner. Great atmospheric music and sound effects (the opening scene was pretty awesome). Voice acting is quite good and extensive for an indie game. The puzzles are fair, action actually quite gripping and the story not too bad.
- Lone Survivor: A survival horror adventure game that messes with your head. While I wasn’t really happy with the visual style at first, it grows on you. The special spooky effects are quite awesome. I think I understand the game loop so far, but have little idea where I’m moving to -for good and bad. There’s certainly a lot of mystery and weirdness going on, but I’m finding the main day game loop is getting shorter and shorter. Definitely recommended though, especially while it’s only $7.99 on Steam.
- Analogue: A Hate Story: Spartan but efficient anime visual novel game. You’re bouncing through log messages, trying to figure out what’s happened on this space ship, whilst interacting with an AI with a secret or two. The story is great, with expert drip-feeding of mystery and information. If you stand back, there’s not a lot to the game, but it really makes full use of its interface for gameplay and story. Recommended if you don’t mind a gentle pace and lots of reading.
- Orcs Must Die!: Yet another tower defence game, but you are part of the real-time defence! There’s a lot of character in this game, and I liked all the different traps. As it goes on it becomes more of a puzzle game since you definitely don’t have enough resources to make the default setup trap-laden. In the end you have to guide the flow of orcs into your much cheaper (and hopefully more efficient) meat grinder.
- Dear Esther: If you want to be gaming literate, you need to play Dear Esther. It’s far removed from being a traditional game but still excellent and definitely suited to its gameplay. You can’t run, jump or shoot. There’s no inventory. In a sense there isn’t even a straight story. But it’s excellent and some of the visuals are breathtaking.
If you didn’t catch all the triple A games from before, I heartily recommend (in order of recommendation) Batman: Arkham City, Mass Effect 3, Saints Row 3 and Skyrim. Serious Sam: BFE is good if you’re nostalgic for that sort of thing, but after a while I found it an adrenaline-filled game that was somehow simultaneously boring.
Do you have any recommendations for lesser-known but still excellent games?
Mass Effect 3 is out and bringing an end to a much-loved series. However with its arrival, there has been a growing chorus of dislike for the ending. So much so that people have started protests to “retake” the ending, protesting seemingly non-aggressively by making all proceeds go to Child’s Play.
I, however, liked the ending. I thought I might lay out some of my thoughts on the ending and this protest. I’m not really trying to persuade anyone. There’s just some interesting talking points.
For the love of God, if you haven’t finished Mass Effect 3, DON’T READ THIS BLOG UNTIL YOU DO. It’s going to be totally spoiler-tastic. You should judge the ending on your own terms, then join the discussion.
I’ve been toiling away for a little while and I finally have something to show you guys. My gaming outfit Cognitive Discodance has a website, and so does the game I’m working on. I’ll let them speak for themselves.:
Over the next little while, I’ll probably tweak these a little to fix bugs and add a little more polish.
Well holy mackerel, 2012 has hit and we’re already 12.5% of the way through. I’ve hit the ground running and am chugging away at my projects. I thought it might be a good time to tell everyone what I’m up to.
Recently indie group Nimblebit called out games giant Zynga for copying their game Tiny Tower pretty blatantly. Zynga employees call this “fast following” – someone achieves success in the mobile or social games arena, and Zynga acquires or produces pretty much the same game. There are some nasty specifics to the Nimblebit saga, but I don’t want to cover that. Nor do I want to look at Zynga’s history (and current practice) of doing this. I wanted to free-think on the question: “What can an indie developer do to prevent fast following?”[1. I’ll use the term “fast following” throughout to avoid the complexities of saying “copycats”. I got the term from Video Games Hot Dog, but apparently it’s a well-known concept.]
There’s nothing you can do about people making a similar game in the same vein. Intellectual property law won’t protect you. Nor should it. People should be free to be inspired by things and produce their own versions. We don’t want to discourage competition because if you’re worried about someone creating a better game in that genre, you’re tacitly admitting you don’t have much faith in your game. You have to do things that make you happy and proud.
We want to protect against nefarious people who essentially want to rebrand our game as their own. By this I mean more studios examining a game, copying all the features and behaviours and replicating that in their own code. Reskinning, renaming or repackaging is too blatant for this discussion. Fast followers are slavish imitations that require a few things to work:
- A popular game;
- Easily copyable technology;
- Enough scope in implementation to put your own branding on it without having to do actual game design or anything too creative.
These are the areas we need to disrupt to protect against fast followers. I know it’s a grey area between copying and imitation, but I hope you understand what we’re defending against.
The easiest solution is to not have a game. Or have a terrible one. Fast followers are motivated by money, and there’s no money in terrible games.
The next easiest thing is to send in the lawyers. Let them fight it out. This is boring and expensive. And it won’t protect you in the future. You certainly don’t want to try to restrict how the world interacts with your game via restrictive EULAs. You might vaguely disrupt a fast follower, but you’ll equally disrupt genuine customers and people who want to mod your game, which is a net loss.
Note that all the DRM in the world won’t help you. Fast followers can just sit there and play the game to learn enough to copy it.
The first easy solution dealt with the first requirement for fast followers. Let’s consider the second requirement: “Easily copyable technology”.
By technology I mean both game mechanics and actual technology in the game. Here we are protecting against fairly lazy reverse engineering. Again, there’s little you can do against people who open your game up in a debugger or disassembler and figure out the inner workings of your game. That said, that approach isn’t easy for the fast followers.
Simple gameplay mechanics make it easy to comprehend what’s going on under the hood, and thus easy to copy. This was Tiny Tower’s curse. Tiny Tower had an extremely limited set of gameplay actions. At best you could react to whatever the game had provided. You could speed things up temporarily through a series of microtransactions. There was very little that you could do to permanently unthrottle the gameplay.
I played Tiny Tower for a while. I angrily deleted it because of its fairly obvious attempts to squeeze money from you. But before that I thought, “Surely, someone could write a more fun Tiny Tower! Maybe even I could do it!” I didn’t, of course, but it was conceivable. For good or bad, Tiny Tower’s simplicity made it vulnerable to copying.
More complicated gameplay is more complicated to copy, especially if they don’t have access to the source code. This goes double for complicated technology. Trying to copy the technology in id’ Rage would be nearly impossible. Even though people in the industry generally get the idea of Megatexture, the years of expertise and technology that went into making their game engine would humble many a dev team.
Another example would be the advanced AI in a game like Facade. This was (and remains) cutting-edge stuff. The amount of work required to sufficiently emulate the storytelling in Facade is enormous. Faking it would likely give you a game not as good as Facade. It wouldn’t be worthwhile to fast follow it.
Gameplay is a funny thing to try to regulate to protect oneself from fast followers. In some situations, like first-person shooters, game mechanics are almost dictated by the genre. Messing with the gameplay too much might give you a substandard shooter.
One way in how you can protect yourself is via content. Write excellent content and there’s no way they can replicate it without obviously copying it. Tiny Tower has very little content, so it was easy to copy. Something like Portal would be relatively easy to copy in terms of game mechanics, but the writing and level design is so excellent, you’d have to come off second best.
Same goes for Skyrim, or any Bioware game. There’s so much excellent content there you’d die just transcribing it all.
And it’s not just AAA titles. Something like Kingdom of Loathing is comprised mostly of writing. Lots and lots of writing. You could copy the game mechanics, but you couldn’t copy the writing (because of copywriting, and their unique, humorous style). Some have tried, and provided shinier graphics, but ultimately failed.
Another strong way to prevent fast following is to have your gameplay and content deeply intertwined with your technology. An example of a series of games that doesn’t have this property is Zynga’s series of Farmville, Cityville and so forth. Each is more-or-less a reskin of the other. Mechanics are similar (not to say they are the same, Zynga does evolve somewhat). They could create a Spaceville game that worked much the same. This is good for franchises – players of previous titles can easily pick up the newer titles since they’ve already learned the mechanics and interface.
A game like Shadow of the Colossus would be a positive example for this idea. The technology involved in bringing the visuals to colossus-killing was quite an achievement, and it was a direct requirement of the gameplay. You could perhaps make a cheaper version without the technology that corresponded to an old-school platformer, but that’s more a cash-in than a fast follow.
The industry is in a bit of a stir given big companies like Zynga are adopting strategies of much smaller outfits, like copycatting, fast following and the like. This is amidst all the financial disruption of microtransaction models, cheaper prices for online games, and cloud-based game rentals like Gaikai. The games industry is adapting, but I think the positive outcome is that for games companies to survive, a great strategy is to make unique, creative games. It’s not easy, but if it were easy, we wouldn’t be worrying about Zynga in the first place.
- Gamasutra’s article: “Talking copycats with Zynga’s design chief”
- Edge’s article on the (boring) legal approach: “How to protect your game against cloning“
- Develop’s interview: “Zynga: Improving others’ innovations is fair game“
- Forbes magazine: “Leaked Zynga Memo Justifies Copycat strategy“
- From 2010, World According to Carp talking about “Fast following” in a general startup sense
- Video Games Hot Dog, Episode 37, where they talk about this stuff.
I have a confession to make. I’ve been working on a review of Saints Row The Third for a little while now, but Christmas got in the way. I’ve 100% the game and loved every minute of it. However my long form review was more-or-less captured by ex-RPS writer Kieron Gillen in his Eurogamer review. In short, it’s a game of pure madness, where if you trust the developers to give you fun, they’ll deliver by the truckload. It’s not at all subtle or particularly sophisticated, but it’s very, very fun. I like what they are doing with player-based content and telemetry, and it’s great to see a developer smack it out of the park with good humour.
Anyway, I had captured over 100 screenshots in preparation for the review, and I can’t let them go to waste. So I present to you my insane, not-safe-for-work holiday in Steelport (aka Saints Row 3):
Thanks to the lovely folks at RockPaperShotgun, I managed to snag a weekend beta pass to Star Wars The Old Republic. I’ve never been huge on MMORPGS but I’m not alien to them – I invested a fair amount of time into Matrix Online, a reasonable amount of time in Lord of the Rings Online, played some WoW and D&D Online, and I still play the heck out of Kingdom of Loathing (although KoL is a slightly different beast). SWTOR has been dubbed a potential “WoW killer”, so I was interested to see how it panned out. I wasn’t personally interested in playing, until my friend showed me this:
I mean, seriously. A Jawa with a rocket launcher? What’s not to love?!
So this weekend I put in a few sessions with the game as a female human Smuggler (in that I’m a female smuggling goods, not ladies). She’s got the whole Han Solo thing going, which is cool. She’s at level 8 or 9 now. I’m still in the newbie class-specific area (that I share with Troopers). My character’s recent skill acquisition was effectively “kick them in the groin”. It complemented my “throw a grenade into their face” skill.
What’s it like? Well, it’s like a MMO. It’s like WoW. It’s like expansive, slightly low res environments where nameplates run around and there are little pockets of bad guys standing around, waiting to die. It’s like watching cooldown on icons so you can do your same cycle of skills to kill yet another insurgent that’s getting in the way of you running to a dude and getting the next location to run to. Of course, I’m overly cynical here. SWTOR is definitely an improvement over the WoW style (last time I played WoW). Having conversations with quest-givers actually be little cutscenes (a la Mass Effect or any other modern Bioware game) is neat. My first bunch of NPCs were really boring and I was a bit disappointed that they had spent a lot of time and money getting voice actors to deliver boring stuff. But as I got on, the animation got better, the writing more nuanced and the voice acting more varied and interesting. I wasn’t blown away by it, but man, it’s so much of an improvement over WoW “oh gawd, I dunno, fetch 10 wolf pelts” streamlined quest givers.
I don’t know if Lord of the Rings started it, but I like the seemingly new design choice to make the quests from quest-givers actually something with a plot, and incidentally along the way you can kill 10 bad guys and get a bonus. LotRO invested more in it (in that the “kill 50 dragonflies” were quests that hung around) but SWTOR seems to make them more thematic. For example, all of mine thus far have been to teach a lesson to the separatists as part of a larger campaign, so I kill 12 separatist scum whilst travelling between quest-giver and quest-Macguffin.
All the things you’d expect for a MMO to have is there: an extensive list of social actions, quick-fire slots for all your skills, hub cities with clusters of vendors, if you hover over an item it’ll tell you what you get by equipping it versus what you already have… There’s a fast travel taxi service between areas, and my character at least had a special “Quick travel” skill to zip between known areas. It’s all from Ye Mighty Checklist of Modern MMORPGs and it’s all done pretty competently. The UI is slick and help isn’t too hard to get. The codex entries are fairly detailed, but I never read them. There were some nifty surveys on quests to help them fine-tune the game. I grinned at a support request coming back to me via “Protocol Droid M0-T0 of Human-Cyborg relations”.
It’s all very well done. Maybe better done than WoW. But to me, it’s still just polishing that old tile. A lot of my time was spent creeping between pockets of bad guys, gradually nuking them with grenades, or finding the racing line between them to avoid aggro. All the bad guys exist to die, and you kinda have to wait your turn for them to respawn before you get your chance to kill them. It’s like an oversized fun park where you have to travel sizable, awkward distances to get anywhere, and all the rides are Skinner boxes. In this sense, SWTOR was not much different to the Star Wars MUD I played about a decade ago.
The writing here is much better than I’ve seen in other MMOs, but it’s not excellent as far as real writing goes. Most characters are introduced just to discard once the quest is complete. Despite their plight, there’s nothing to invest in here. I like that quest-givers are voiced and animated, and there are usually interesting camera angles on the action. But the animation in cutscenes is merely serviceable, and the vast majority of your interactions in the world are with very strict animation state machines (aka bad guys).
All-in-all I think SWTOR is a good take on the modern MMO formula, but with all the money and talent they threw at it, I’m a little disappointed that it’s a shinier version of more of the same. It’d be risky to do something new and there’s a lot of money on the line, but the gameplay has barely evolved since the mid-2000’s. I would love to see someone turn the formula inside out and produce something new. Regardless, I know a bunch of my friends will invest sizable chunks of their life to this game, but I don’t think I will. My mistress has and probably always will be Team Fortress 2, but if someone would do something significantly different from prettier, more fine-tuned Skinner boxes, I’d be into MMOs in a heartbeat.
So while Jawas with rocket launchers are hells cool, and I enjoyed my weekend as a female Han Solo, I think I’ll leave SWTOR to the millions and millions of people who will enjoy the heck out of this game.